Dynamic channel allocation research Prof Lajos Hanzo, Dr. Jonathan Blogh |
Jon's area of research to date has been the capacity study of GSM based cellular networks, using fixed and dynamic channel llocation schemes. Since the performance of a cellular network is generally limited by the levels of interference present, the effects of using adaptive antenna arrays at the basestations to reduce this interference were analysed.
Work has also been carried out to investigate the network performance benefits of power control and power control used in conjunction with adaptive modulation techniques. It was found that using just power control reduced the required transmission powers, hence extended battery life, whilst simulataneously enhancing the network performance. However, when used with adaptive modulation these benefits were compounded with improved modem throughput. John's current work is focused on investigating the network capacity and performance of the next generation CDMA based, UMTS cellular networks due to come into service in a couple of years time. Figure 1: Graph of minimum uplink SINR of the 7centre cells of a GSM based cellular network. [top] |
Mobile social networking aided content dissemination in heterogeneous networks Prof. Lajos Hanzo, Prof. Lie-Liang Yang, Dr. Jie Hu |
[1] Distributed Cooperative Social Multicast Aided Content Dissemination in Random Mobile Networks [2] Throughput and Delay Analysis of Wireless Multicast in Distributed Mobile Social Networks Based on Geographic Social Relationships |
A distributed multistage cooperative-social-multicast-protocol-aided content dissemination scheme is proposed, which is based on a self-organized ad hoc network of mobile stations (MSs) seeking the same content. In our content dissemination scheme, upon receiving the content, the content owners may further multicast it to their social contacts who are hitherto unserved content seekers. Then, we mathematically define the geographic social strength to describe the social relationships between a pair of MSs. By jointly considering the geographic social strength, the geographic distances, and the path loss, as well as the small-scale fading, we derive the closed-form formula of the average social unicast throughput. Furthermore, we model the content dissemination process by a discrete-time pure-birth-based Markov chain and derive the closed-form expressions for the statistical properties of the content dissemination delay. The proposed multistage cooperative social multicast protocol is capable of successfully delivering the content of common interest to all MSs in two transmission frames, provided that the density of the MSs is sufficiently high, as demonstrated both by our simulation and analytical results. Figure 1. An example of the social multicast. The content owner (CO) is only willing to multicast the content of common interest to its social contacts. A successful content delivery from a transmitter to a receiver depends on the following two conditions: (1) The receiver is a social contact of the transmitter; (2) The signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) at the receiver end has to exceed a pre-defined SNR threshold for the successful content reception. A pair of MUs share a social relationships with a specific probability, which is defined by their geographic social strength. The content can be successfully delivered by a wireless link connecting a transmitter and receiver pair with another specific probability, which is determined by the related physical layer model. By jointly considering both the social relationship and wireless propagation characteristics, we can transform the left-hand-side `Real Social Multicast Scenario' to the right-hand-side `Mathematically Equivalent Model', where a receiver is connected to a transmitter by a `social wireless link'. Figure 2. Multi-stage cooperative social multicast protocol. During Frame 1, the CO set {CO1, CO2} cooperatively multicasts the content to the unserved CS set {CS1, CS2, CS3}. At the end of Frame 1, CS1 successfully receives the content and joins the CO set as CO3. Thus, during Frame 2, the new CO set {CO1, CO2, CO3} cooperatively multicasts the content to the unserved CS set {CS2, CS3 }. By the end of Frame 2, CS2 successfully receives the content and joins the CO set as CO4. Finally, during Frame 3, the new CO set {CO1, CO2, CO3, CO4} carries out the last stage of cooperative social multicast, and successfully delivers the content to the last unserved CS3.
|